Heller Highwater (hellerdrone.wordpress.com)
Last Modified: September 14, 2008
- Don't be a dill weed.
- Treat other people the way you want to be treated.
- Ladies and children first.
- This is a rescue, not a bitch session.
- Help don't harm.
- Save the snarks for the attorneys and
Above The Law.
Heller Highwater is not:
- a place to practice viscious and vindictive "whisper down the lane" rumour-mongering;
- a place to bad mouth co-workers;
- a place for diatribes against specific people or specific incidents;
- a place to heap pity on poor Heller Ehrman staff by outsiders;
- a place that discriminates or sets margins noting who is outside and who is inside - we even welcome supportive Heller Ehrman attorneys!;
- meant to further the demise of Heller Ehrman, LLP.
Heller Highwater is:
- a place for support, a place of empowerment, a place of passion;
- a place to learn about job leads, resume preparation, skill building, training, new opportunities, and how to succeed in a new workplace;
- a place to keep up on the latest news as to how Heller Ehrman management intends to treat its support staff as it winds down its operations - will it be every woman for herself? or will it be "let me hold the door for you and is there anything else I can do for you"?
- a place of refuge.
Note: in no way, shape or form is
Heller Highwater sanctioned, supported or even recognized, (but it is very likely monitored) by the management of
Heller Erhman, LLP. The opinions represented here and on each and every page of Heller Highwater do not constitute the opinions of Heller Ehrman, LLP or its shareholders or its management. In addition, the comments left by visitors do not reflect the opinions of Heller Highwater.
Neither the Simon suit nor the D.C. landlord’s suit suggest an early Heller bankruptcy filing. Both suits have status conference dates months into next year, and neither plaintiff seems to have sought any prejudgment relief. In these circs, bankruptcy is still a long way from necessary. (Doesn’t mean it won’t happen, but it is not forced or necessary.)
I haven’t taken a close look at developments in the S.F. landlord’s suit. That plaintiff was seeking prejudgment relief, which could preciptitate events. That plaintiff would still be behind the bank lien, but I don’t know how the bank would react/has reacted to the landlord’s effort.
I’ll aim to post again after seeing if I can see what has happened in the S.F. landlord suit.
P.S.: In the S.F. landlord’s suit, there is a hearing on the landlord’s motion for an attachment on Dec. 19. The docket suggests that either Heller or the bank would file some responsive paper, but none are yet visible in the docket.