Today’s Firmwide Meeting – What To Watch For

Here are some things you might be on the listen for at the upcoming video conferences/meetings:

1. Efforts to weasel out of obligations to employees: If employees work or have worked, they must be paid. Employees also must be paid their accrued vacation and reimbursed expenses.  Employees may be entitled to severance pay under state or federal WARN laws. In a WARN mass lay-off it doesn’t matter whether employees quickly find new jobs (on their own or by moving with a group to a new firm), severance is owed.

I assume Heller management may have some kinds of deferred compensation plans/perks; depending on how these were set-up, some money may be owed to employees. Same is true with bonus and stock investment plans.

Listen carefully when management talks about health insurance: Heller management might be legally entitled to cut-off medical plans very quickly and/or limit the number of employees to who COBRA is available.  Listen for an unequivocal confirmation that there are no issues with the 401k or any other retirement funds that might affect our ability to access/rollover our accounts.  And ask when the plan(s) are being shut down.

2.  Blaming the banks: If there is any degree of weaseling on obligations to employees, management/shareholders will try to blame it on the banks, e.g., “gosh, we’re really sorry, but the bank won’t let us pay you.” If you hear that, alarm bells should be ringing loudly because it’s a weasel attempt to get off the hook but still look like a good guy.

Banks don’t force customers to break laws. No bank is going to tell Heller management that they cannot pay what is legally owed to their employees. It’s true that the banks might tell the shareholders that they – the banks – won’t lend/advance money for the shareholders to pay their obligations, but that’s very different than saying “you can’t pay them.” If the banks won’t lend/advance the money, then it’s up to the Firm and the shareholders to find another way to come up with the money to pay the employees. An LLP isn’t the absolute person protection that some like to think (just ask the Brobeck partners).

Employees work for one, many, or all partners. At least in California, wage claims can be made against not just the firm, but also or alternatively against individual partners.

3.  “Sorry, there’s no money:” Another statement that should set off the alarm bells. Of course there’s money, and lots of it. Not only are there accounts receivables, but there’s also a huge asset in the value of the business which has been, is being, and will be taken to other firms. A portion of that value is owed to Heller or, if and when it goes into dissolution, the Heller estate.

For example, though not well publicized, there’s quite a list of firms that took in former Brobeck partners and ended up paying millions to the Brobeck estate. If the bank debt is secured (and possibly backed-up to some extent with personal recourse guarantees from shareholders), so the banks stand first in line to be paid off. Still, there should be a lot of money left after the banks are paid off.

In Brobeck’s case, and keep in mind that Brobeck had run up a huge bank debt, the amount recovered after the banks were paid totals over $75 million, possibly as much as $100 million. With Heller’s reputation as financially conservative, it is most likely that bank debt is much lower than Brobeck’s was, but its receivables and the value of business taken away should be at least as high as Brobeck’s, thus the assumption that there is indeed money available.

The questions, however, are how much of that money Heller management really want to collect, and what they really want to do with it. Heller management probably won’t mind hitting up most clients for the accounts receivables, but they might very likely not want to go after other firms for the value of business taken from Heller. The Heller shareholders are out there trying to sell themselves and their books of business, trying to make the best compensation deals possible for themselves, and that’s a lot easier to do if the acquiring firm thinks it’s getting the partner(s)’s book free and clear, i.e., won’t have to pay anything to Heller for the value of the book. So it’s easy to imagine that the Heller shareholders and management will agree not to pursue recovery of money for the value of business taken to new firms—even though that money could be used to pay what’s owed employees and other unsecured creditors.

4.  “The partners are losing much more:”  At one other blog, a partner is complaining about having lost his capital. The affect of some shareholders moaning about their lost capital is to make some/many employees feel sympathetic to the shareholders or even guilty for asking to be paid. It’s as though shareholders are saying “my loss is much greater than yours, you should be glad you haven’t lost as much as me, and you certainly shouldn’t be asking me to pay for your loss.”

In my view that’s total hooey. Economic loss, and the harm caused by it, is relative. Comparison of absolute numbers is not only misleading, but also downright deceptive. On average, Heller shareholders made over $1 million a year. Despite their grumbling and their seemingly constant pursuit of ever more money, these are wealthy people. In all likelihood, the partners’ wealth and position will allow them to bear and recover their loss much easier and much faster than the average staffer can.

In the Brobeck collapse, no partners lost their homes and ended up living in shelters, but staffers did. So if you hear shareholders trying to minimize employees’ loss by comparing it to their own, then you might have to decide whether they’re doing so because they’re clueless idiots or manipulative weasels.

5.  The Nuremberg Defense: It’s not uncommon for people to have trouble accepting and acknowledging that their actions or inactions have hurt others. Most of us seem to have a need to be thought of as a good person. I wouldn’t be surprised to hear that a lot of shareholders, especially the rank and file ones, are telling themselves and whoever will listen some variation of “it’s not my fault.” Some will say they didn’t know, some will say there was nothing they could do, some will say both. And most of the employees will feel sorry for some or all shareholders, and will let them off the blame hook. What’s most important now, however, isn’t taking blame for the past, but rather taking responsibility in the present and future. Fault is a red herring. Right now it doesn’t really matter how this happened or who caused it or who knew what was going on. What does matter is that they all know what’s going on now. For however many years, they reaped the considerable benefits of partnership, of being an owner of the firm. If the ability to think of themselves, and have others think of them as a good person, then they have to accept and own up to the fact that as owners of the firm they have legal and moral responsibilities to their employees. They might not be to blame for things going sour, but if they don’t step up now to make sure all employees are treated fairly then they will be at fault.

6.  The False Heroes: This is definitely related to the last point. Some shareholders might make quite the show of patting themselves on the back for taking some employees with them to their new firms. These types act like letting a few people into their lifeboat not only discharges their responsibilities to all the employees, but more obnoxiously that they’re some kind of heroic saviors. As noted elsewhere, only those who can directly benefit the shareholder(s) are given a seat in a lifeboat. Others, especially administrative staffers, won’t get offered a seat.

The way I see it: if a hundred people get thrown into the water on your watch, pulling a half dozen into a lifeboat doesn’t make you a hero. Heroes are those who make sure no person’s left behind. And say or think what you will about Tower Snow, but he did not leave Clifford Chance until he’d made sure every employee found a new job.

* * *

I continue to believe that Heller management and shareholders will behave responsibly and honorably to their employees. I fervently hope none of the alarm bells mentioned above will ring anywhere throughout Heller. As in the past, I’ve written this hoping that it’ll prove completely unnecessary, but with the sad recognition that there’s at least some small possibility that it won’t be.

Over and out.

Heller Drone
Cruise Director

Advertisements

13 Responses to “Today’s Firmwide Meeting – What To Watch For”


  1. 1 legalese_retard 25 September 2008 at 12:07 pm

    awesome post. by preempting the excuses the firm might have made, i think this post has protected the interests of all of heller’s employees. good luck.

  2. 2 Observer 25 September 2008 at 12:21 pm

    Excellent post!

  3. 3 Lookie-Lou 25 September 2008 at 12:56 pm

    This is so sad. But in a perverse way, keeping up with developments is gripping drama to us outsiders. Can’t wait to hear the hundreds of stories post-shipsinking. Soon to be a major motion picture? Or at least a mention on those tourist busses as they cruise down Bush Street? “On your right, 333 Bush, where Heller Ehrman once stood tall. Like the Maya, they mysteriously vanished back in ’08 …”

  4. 4 Atticus Finch 25 September 2008 at 1:47 pm

    Per Law.com- it’s a done deal…so sad.
    God speed to you all!

    Breaking News: Heller Dissolving Friday
    Niraj Chokshi
    09-25-2008

    Heller Ehrman partners will vote to dissolve the firm on Friday.

    The news was announced by Chairman Matt Larrabee at a meeting that began at 1 p.m. Thursday, according to a Heller staffer attending the meeting.

    Larrabee told all attorneys and staff that dissolution is unavoidable and that the partnership will voluntarily dissolve. Staff will be paid on Friday, Larrabee said, and indicated that under the federal WARN Act, associates and staff would be paid for the next 60 days. A small group of staff would remain beyond that date to handle the winding down of the firm’s business.

    Serious questions about the 118-year-old firm’s ability to survive were raised at the beginning of last week when merger talks with Mayer Brown collapsed and a group of 14 intellectual property partners announced they were leaving the firm.

    As recently as 2004, Heller ranked second on The American Lawyer’s A-list, a ranking of firms based on a variety of factors such as profitability, pro bono representation, associate satisfaction and diversity ratings.

    Cal Law will have more information as it becomes available

  5. 5 Helmintholith 25 September 2008 at 1:56 pm

    Full text. Best to you all…it’s a tragedy.

    Heller Dissolving Friday

    The Recorder

    By Niraj Chokshi and Zusha Elinson

    September 25, 2008

    Heller Ehrman partners will vote to dissolve the firm on Friday.

    The news was announced by Chairman Matthew Larrabee at a meeting that began at 1 p.m. today, according to a Heller staffer in attendance.

    Larrabee told all attorneys and staff that dissolution is unavoidable and that the partnership is expected to vote to voluntarily dissolve, for which a two-thirds vote is reportedly needed.

    He described the dissolution of the firm as a tragedy for the entire legal industry and, after about 10 minutes, turned the meeting over to partners in each of the firm’s offices for in-person question-and-answer sessions.

    Staff will be paid on Friday, Larrabee said, and indicated that under the federal WARN Act, associates and staff would be paid for the next 60 days. A small group of staff would remain beyond that date to handle the winding down of the firm’s business.

    During a New York office meeting following Larrabee’s talk, a partner there said the firm expects to collect at least 90 percent of an estimated $118 million in accounts receivable. Heller has about $6 million in cash, that shareholder reportedly said.

    By 1:30 p.m., Heller employees were coming out of the firm’s San Francisco headquarters at 333 Bush St., some in tears, some hugging one another for support. They said they don’t know what their next moves would be, or where they’d find work.

    “This totally sucks,” a shaken woman from the firm’s support staff said softly.

    Shareholder Jonathan Hayden, who has been with the firm since 1981, called it an incredibly sad day for the institution. “As somebody who’s an owner here, my heart really goes out to everyone who works here. They’re the ones who made us successful.”

    Hayden said he was less concerned about shareholders being able to find new firms than he was about the fate of staffers. He declined to comment on talks to move large practice groups or offices to other firms.

    Bill Henn, a secretary at Heller for 28 years, said the announcement didn’t come as a surprise, since rumors had swirled for weeks. Still, that didn’t make the news any easier for staff to hear.

    “I didn’t want to cry. There were a lot of people crying,” said Henn, 65. “It’s really sad.”

    The meeting began with a firmwide video presentation from Larrabee, which Henn said lasted about 20 minutes. After that, individual offices were addressed by their local leaders. In San Francisco, that was S.F. Managing Partner Barry Levin, who chaired the firm during its growth phase earlier this decade.

    “Barry said, ‘I thought I’d be up here announcing a merger rather than a dissolution,'” Henn said. He said that, like Larrabee, Levin talked for 20 minutes and was apologetic and sad. Levin choked up at the end, Henn said.

    “I think Heller is … was … a special place,” Henn said. “For a lot of people, it was a family.”

    Henn said staffers are hoping to be retained when larger groups of attorneys land at new firms, and he confirmed that staff were given 60 days’ notice, and so will continue working for at least those two months. “I’ll come in until there’s nothing to come in to.”

    Serious questions about the 118-year-old firm’s ability to survive were raised at the beginning of last week when merger talks with Mayer Brown collapsed and a group of 14 intellectual property partners announced they were leaving the firm.

    As recently as 2004, Heller ranked second on Recorder affiliate The American Lawyer’s A-list, a ranking of firms based on a variety of factors, such as pro bono representation, associate satisfaction and diversity ratings.

  6. 6 anon 25 September 2008 at 2:00 pm

    why no update?

  7. 7 Observer 25 September 2008 at 2:40 pm

    Because Cruise Director is out having a well-deserved drink?

  8. 8 hellerdrone 25 September 2008 at 3:04 pm

    Cruise Dreictor is shloshed.

  9. 9 SA07 25 September 2008 at 5:27 pm

    It has already been said, but excellent post!

  10. 10 TRULY SAD 25 September 2008 at 7:09 pm

    Maybe being kept as one of the “key people,” after the 60 days, I am worried as HELL about having health insurance after that period. COBRA IS EXPENSIVE, I don’t want to pay for that.

  11. 11 Anon 25 September 2008 at 11:07 pm

    Ok, I’m getting really tired of hearing the advice “to talk to the partners to see if they’ll take you with them wherever they end up.” There are plenty of Hellerites in each office that don’t happen to work for partners. Guess we’re just dead in the water? Honestly, I hope Matt Larrabee never ever manages another law firm. What a disaster. What a performance.

  12. 12 COBRA? 26 September 2008 at 8:39 am

    Well, actually, TRULY SAD, it may be worse than that. To my best (lay) knowledge, COBRA only applies if a health plan exists: it mandates that ex-employees can stay in the health plan, albeit at a high price (calculation of actual costs, pre-company contribution, plus a percentage for “admin”). If the health plan is closed, then no COBRA, and no healthcare. Those of us with expensive medications (one of mine is $1,708.09 per month, list price, at Walgreens) are feeling extra stressed.

  13. 13 hellerdrone 26 September 2008 at 8:53 am

    COBRA?

    Good point and this is why I mention that fact that Heller management could very easily shut down all the benefits plans.

    I will be doing a post of this and other issues once the WARN notices come out. It might also help if we can find a broker for medical insurance who could get the best deal for a group of ex-Hellerites in each port of call.


Comments are currently closed.



Life preserver.jpg
Remember the words of Rev. Frank Scott (Gene Hackman in The Poseidon Adventure):

". . . sitting on our butts is not going to help us either. Maybe by climbing out of here, we can save ourselves. If you've got any sense, you'll come along with us."

Contact Us!

Send us your information as to job leads, networking, or just plain vent!
Go ahead, say it!
Add to Technorati Favorites
Bloggers' Rights at EFF

Credits

This blog has been created by Thomas MacEntee.

Recent Comments

Terms of Service

Heller Highwater (hellerdrone.wordpress.com)
Last Modified: September 14, 2008

- Don't be a dill weed.

- Treat other people the way you want to be treated.

- Ladies and children first.

- This is a rescue, not a bitch session.

- Help don't harm.

- Save the snarks for the attorneys and Above The Law.

Heller Highwater is not:

- a place to practice viscious and vindictive "whisper down the lane" rumour-mongering;

- a place to bad mouth co-workers;

- a place for diatribes against specific people or specific incidents;

- a place to heap pity on poor Heller Ehrman staff by outsiders;

- a place that discriminates or sets margins noting who is outside and who is inside - we even welcome supportive Heller Ehrman attorneys!;

- meant to further the demise of Heller Ehrman, LLP.

Heller Highwater is:

- a place for support, a place of empowerment, a place of passion;

- a place to learn about job leads, resume preparation, skill building, training, new opportunities, and how to succeed in a new workplace;

- a place to keep up on the latest news as to how Heller Ehrman management intends to treat its support staff as it winds down its operations - will it be every woman for herself? or will it be "let me hold the door for you and is there anything else I can do for you"?

- a place of refuge.

Note: in no way, shape or form is Heller Highwater sanctioned, supported or even recognized, (but it is very likely monitored) by the management of Heller Erhman, LLP. The opinions represented here and on each and every page of Heller Highwater do not constitute the opinions of Heller Ehrman, LLP or its shareholders or its management. In addition, the comments left by visitors do not reflect the opinions of Heller Highwater.

%d bloggers like this: